As a household answers, chooses and talks to the coach, the product keeps notes on what they care about, and uses them to guide what comes next. This page is the promise that makes that acceptable: they are told first, they can say no as easily as yes, they see every note and where it came from, and they can fix it, take a copy, stop it or delete it. We never sell it.
One new group on House, and one new step in the first hour. Nothing else in the product changes shape to make room.
House
Vision had no house-level door before this: the app reaches it only from a room’s follow-up question (conv_narrow_screen.dart:215). One group gives both a home, and it is the first thing on House rather than a setting.
The row says how many notes there are. It never says something is waiting. Ruled: no interrupts, anywhere.
As you go, we will learn what you two care about.
So what you tell us once helps with every choice after it.
Nothing about Sam is learned until Sam taps Sounds good. Nora gets her own step when she joins. Saying yes also lets the first pass read what Sam already answered; saying no stores nothing new. A solo household reads “what you care about” and has no Nora line.
Not fine print. It is the sentence a person is owed before they agree, and it repeats on every surface where they might change their mind.
As you go, we will learn what you two care about.
Saying no has to be as easy as saying yes. A sheet that talks somebody out of refusing is not consent. Our reading of GDPR Art. 7, pending counsel.
Answers are the house’s record and not part of this consent. Without that line, no reads as lose my work.
What waits for them, where they differ, what we believe, and what is theirs to take or end. A note reaches a prompt only after this place has shown it to the person it is about.
What we have learned
From what you have told us and chosen.
A new guess, a clash with something they confirmed, and whether a note is true of every house or only this one. Each shows its evidence as the things they actually said or chose. A note is used only once this place has shown it. A scope question leaves the note on This house for now until it is answered.
Our guess and Confirmed are different marks, and This house and Any house say where a note applies. No percentage: a model’s confidence is not calibrated, and a number would pretend it was.
Priorities and dealbreakers stay in Vision and are read live. A second copy is a copy that goes stale the first time Vision is edited.
Nothing is stored about her. What Sam said about her in onboarding stays Sam’s answer, read live where Sam’s answers are read, and never becomes a note of hers. Her notes start when she joins and says yes. Here she has, which is why she has notes.
What we have learned
A saved fix is corrected, and inference never rewrites it again. Remove note deletes the sentence and its evidence. What stays is a marker with no words in it (who, kind, topic) so the same answers cannot bring it back, and the sheet says so.
What we have learned
Our reading of GDPR Art. 7(3), pending counsel. Consent is each person’s: Sam stopping covers the notes about Sam. A seated Nora has her own switch, and notes about both of them stop being used until both have learning on.
Stopping usually means forget it. Deleting runs the same erasure as account deletion, limited to these notes and their evidence. Our reading of Art. 17, pending counsel.
What we have learned
No count of what they are missing and no reminder elsewhere. Turning it on is one tap, and returns them to frame 2’s promise.
What we have learned
These notes are not synced to the phone: every use of them is on the server. So this screen reads online, and its error arm says so rather than drawing an empty profile.